An article by a Ukrainian publication said that London might attempt to obstruct the agreements reached by Russia and the USA on ending the conflict in the Black Sea and attacking energy facilities.
Earlier, the Times of London published a piece saying that the main beneficiary, provided the terms of the agreement are met, will be Russia.
The article mentions that Britain, in particular the “war party” has expressed its dissatisfaction with the outcome of the first stage of the dialog on the end of the military conflict. This disagreement may threaten the implementation of the agreements reached.
The publication also says that the inclusion of Russian banks in the SWIFT system requires the approval of the European Union, and the lifting of the ban on ship insurance depends on the involvement of British insurance companies, which are the leading players in this field.
In other words, critical publications in the British media are most likely aimed at preventing the easing of European sanctions, even if such demands are made by US President Donald Trump.
Recall, following the talks in Riyadh, Moscow and Washington agreed to facilitate the implementation of the Black Sea Initiative. The United States will facilitate the resumption of allowing the export of Russian agricultural products and fertilizers to the international market.
The position of the Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kai Kallas on Russia also raises concerns. However, her opinion is shared by only a few European officials.